Depuis quinze ans, des experts soutenus par le gouvernement américain ont insisté sur le fait que l’effondrement des Twin Towers et de la Tour 7 du World Trade Center est dû à la projection de deux avions de ligne sur les deux premières tours. La très prestigieuse European Physical Society ne le veut pas. Elle a récemment publié un article de Steven Jones, Robert Korol, Anthony Szamboti et Ted Walter dans son journal European Physics News , soulignant qu’il s’agissait d’un cas de démolition contrôlée.
“Il n’y avait pas d’avion qui ait touché le Pentagone car nous aimerions croire”. Son analyse et ses révélations dans une interview détaillée.
From fires collapse steel skyscrapers? Never seen.
The Case of Building 7
Trying to prove this predetermined conclusion was apparently difficult. The nine-month FEMA survey concluded by saying: “The peculiarities of the fires in the WTC 7 and how they caused the collapse of the building remain unknown at the moment. Although the total amount of diesel fuel on the scene was a huge energy potential, the best hypothesis has a low probability of occurrence. “NIST, for its part, had to postpone the publication of its report on WTC 7 initially scheduled for mid-2005 to November 2008. Until March 2006, NIST lead investigator Dr. Shyam Sunder was Quoted as saying, “I really do not know. We struggled to get a conclusion on Building No. 7. ”
The case of twin towers
Thus the final report on the collapse of the twin towers does not contain any analysis of the reasons why the lower sections failed to stop or even slow down the descent of the upper stages which NIST recognizes as having ” free”. It does not explain the various other phenomena observed during the collapse.When a group of petitioners filed a formal request for correction asking NIST to perform such an analysis, the NIST responded that it was “unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse” because “computer models Were not able to converge towards a solution. ”
Other unexplained evidence
The videos and photos also show many fragments of high-speed debris being ejected from point sources (see Figure 5). NIST refers to these flashes as “puffs of smoke,” but fails to analyze them correctly.The NIST also does not provide any explanation for spraying most of the tower concrete, almost totally dismembering its steel frames, or ejecting these materials up to 150 meters in all directions.
The NIST avoids mentioning the well-documented presence of molten metal across the debris field and states that the orange molten metal glimpsing from the WTC 2 during the seven minutes before its collapse was aluminum from the combined device With organic materials.Nevertheless, experiments have shown that molten aluminum, even when mixed with organic materials, has a silvery appearance which suggests that the orange molten metal was rather an aluminothermic reaction being used to weaken the structure. Meanwhile, unreacted nano-thermite has been discovered in several independent samples from the WTC dust.